Ketamine: A Clinical Reference
A clinician-facing reference covering ketamine for depression — routes, dosing, protocols, mechanism, evidence, and how ketamine fits alongside ECT, TMS, and other treatments. Written for psychiatrists, primary care clinicians, and therapists seeking a working knowledge of ketamine practice. Evidence figures were re-verified against the primary sources in September 2026; each is linked in the references.
Overview
Ketamine occupies a unique position in the depression treatment landscape. Its antidepressant mechanism is distinct from all existing small-molecule antidepressants — glutamate/NMDA-mediated rather than monoamine-mediated — and its speed of onset (hours) is dramatically faster than anything else available. For patients with severe or treatment-resistant depression, particularly with suicidality, this combination is genuinely valuable.
At the same time, ketamine is not a clean story. The evidence base is strong for acute response but less robust for long-term durability. The psychoactive effects are uncomfortable for some patients. Addiction potential is real. Insurance coverage is uneven. And the "ketamine clinic" industry has expanded faster than quality standards, creating variable care across the country.
History & regulatory context
Ketamine (CI-581) was synthesized at Parke-Davis in the early 1960s as a shorter-acting derivative of phencyclidine (PCP) (Domino 2010). It received FDA approval as an anesthetic in 1970 and remains approved only for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia (IV or IM). It is a Schedule III controlled substance.
The antidepressant signal came from Berman et al. (2000), a seven-patient placebo-controlled crossover study, and was replicated by Zarate et al. (2006) at the NIMH. Murrough et al. (2013) provided the first adequately sized trial against an active placebo (midazolam). Over the following decade the field added repeated-dose trials, a phase 3 program for the S-enantiomer (esketamine), two head-to-head comparisons with ECT, and a growing set of independent re-analyses.
Regulatory timeline (FDA)
- March 5, 2019: Esketamine nasal spray (Spravato) approved for treatment-resistant depression in adults, in conjunction with an oral antidepressant, under a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) that restricts administration to certified healthcare settings with at least 2 hours of post-dose observation.
- July 31, 2020: Supplemental approval for depressive symptoms in adults with MDD with acute suicidal ideation or behavior, with an oral antidepressant. The label states that effectiveness in preventing suicide or reducing suicidal ideation or behavior has not been demonstrated.
- February 16, 2022 and October 10, 2023: FDA compounding risk alerts on compounded ketamine products (nasal, then oral and other formulations) marketed for psychiatric disorders, often for at-home use. The 2023 alert states: “Ketamine is not FDA approved for the treatment of any psychiatric disorder,” and warns that use without provider monitoring for sedation, dissociation, and vital-sign changes “may put patients at risk for serious adverse events.”
- January 17, 2025: Label expanded so that Spravato may be used for TRD as monotherapy, without an oral antidepressant, based on a 378-patient placebo-controlled trial.
Racemic IV ketamine remains off-label for depression and is widely used. The current landscape includes REMS-certified Spravato programs, IV ketamine clinics of highly variable quality, and telehealth-based oral or sublingual ketamine prescribing that the FDA has specifically cautioned against. Each carries a different evidence, regulatory, and monitoring profile.
Indications & patient selection
FDA-approved indications (esketamine/Spravato, January 2025 label)
- Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in adults, as monotherapy or in conjunction with an oral antidepressant
- Depressive symptoms in adults with major depressive disorder with acute suicidal ideation or behavior, in conjunction with an oral antidepressant
Off-label uses of racemic ketamine, by strength of evidence
- Treatment-resistant unipolar depression — the best-supported use: multiple placebo- and midazolam-controlled trials, two randomized comparisons with ECT, and a 174-patient phase 3 trial of subcutaneous ketamine (KADS).
- Acute suicidal ideation — reductions within 24 hours in an individual-participant-data meta-analysis and in a 156-patient placebo-controlled trial (Abbar 2022); a 26-patient trial of repeated infusions in chronic suicidal ideation was negative. No trial has shown a reduction in suicide attempts or deaths.
- Bipolar depression — two small NIMH crossover trials (n = 18 and n = 15) on lithium or valproate were positive at 24 hours to 3 days; the 2021 Cochrane review rated the evidence low to very low certainty. Monitor for manic switch.
- PTSD — mixed: a 30-patient single-site trial of six infusions was positive (67% vs 20% response), but a 158-patient multicenter trial in veterans and service members found no dose-related effect on PTSD symptoms.
Reasonable candidates
- Moderate-to-severe unipolar or bipolar depression with inadequate response to at least two adequate antidepressant trials in the current episode
- Severe depression with significant functional impairment or suicidal ideation where speed of onset matters
- Medically stable, with controlled blood pressure and no aneurysmal vascular disease, arteriovenous malformation, or history of intracerebral hemorrhage
- Capacity for informed consent, including an understanding that benefit is often temporary and that maintenance treatment may be needed
- Able to arrange transportation and post-treatment supervision (no driving until the next day after a restful sleep)
Contraindications
The esketamine label lists only three contraindications (aneurysmal vascular disease or arteriovenous malformation; history of intracerebral hemorrhage; hypersensitivity to esketamine, ketamine or excipients) and treats most other issues as warnings requiring assessment. The lists below are our program's screening criteria and are deliberately more conservative.
Absolute / strong relative contraindications (program criteria)
- Uncontrolled hypertension (our threshold: consistently >160/100; the esketamine label advises weighing delay when pre-dose blood pressure exceeds about 140/90)
- Unstable cardiovascular disease, recent MI, uncontrolled arrhythmia
- Intracranial aneurysm or recent intracranial hemorrhage
- Active psychosis or a primary psychotic disorder (the esketamine label calls for careful assessment and treatment only if benefit outweighs risk)
- Active substance use disorder, particularly ketamine or PCP (boxed warning for abuse and misuse)
- Pregnancy (fetal harm in animal studies, including developmental neurotoxicity; insufficient human data; esketamine is not recommended in pregnancy)
- Severe hepatic impairment
- Hypersensitivity to ketamine, esketamine or excipients
Relative contraindications / increased monitoring
- Controlled but significant cardiovascular disease
- History of severe dissociative or panic responses to substances
- Bipolar I with recent manic/mixed episode
- Severe hepatic/renal dysfunction (affects clearance)
- Increased intraocular or intracranial pressure (the Ketalar label advises caution; human data on ketamine and intracranial pressure are reassuring)
- Benzodiazepine use (may reduce efficacy; consider tapering if possible)
Medication interactions that reduce efficacy
- Benzodiazepines: observational data suggest a blunted and shorter antidepressant response with concomitant benzodiazepines (Andrashko 2020, n = 47); consider tapering or minimizing doses around infusions when feasible. They also add to sedation (esketamine label).
- Lamotrigine: evidence is mixed; in healthy volunteers, lamotrigine pretreatment reduced ketamine's dissociative and psychotomimetic effects but increased its immediate mood-elevating effect (Anand 2000). Not by itself a reason to withhold treatment.
- Naltrexone: Williams et al. 2018 suggests opioid-receptor antagonism interferes with antidepressant efficacy
Routes & formulations
Racemic ketamine is a 50:50 mixture of R-ketamine and S-ketamine enantiomers. Spravato is pure S-ketamine (esketamine). S-ketamine is the more potent enantiomer at the NMDA receptor and as an anesthetic (reported 3–5 fold; Peltoniemi 2016, Ebert 1997); R-ketamine has shown antidepressant-like effects in animal studies. One small randomized trial (n = 63) found a single IV esketamine infusion non-inferior to IV racemic ketamine at 24 hours (Correia-Melo 2020); no randomized trial has compared esketamine nasal spray with IV racemic ketamine.
IV ketamine (racemic)
The most studied route for depression. Generic FDA-approved injectable (Ketalar and generics), used off-label. Typical dose: 0.5–1.0 mg/kg infused over 40–60 minutes. 100% bioavailable by definition. Clinic-based administration under physician supervision (psychiatrist, anesthesiologist, or EM physician).
Pros
- 100% bioavailability
- Weight-based precise dosing
- Can be discontinued immediately if adverse effects
- Racemic mixture (may matter; unclear)
- Strongest evidence base
Cons
- Rarely covered by insurance
- Requires IV placement and monitoring infrastructure
- Typically several hundred dollars per infusion out-of-pocket (varies by clinic)
- Clinic-based only
Spravato (intranasal esketamine)
Pure S-enantiomer in a nasal spray device; each device delivers 28 mg, given as 56 mg (two devices) or 84 mg (three devices). Mean absolute bioavailability is approximately 48% (prescribing information). Self-administered under supervision in a REMS-certified setting, with observation for at least 2 hours after each dose and no driving until the next day. The only ketamine-based product with FDA approval for depression.
Pros
- FDA-approved (TRD, alone or with an oral antidepressant; MDD with acute suicidal ideation or behavior, with an oral antidepressant)
- Usually covered by insurance
- No IV placement required
- Standardized delivery
- REMS monitoring program
Cons
- Fixed dosing (56 or 84 mg, no weight-based adjustment)
- Variable absorption via nasal mucosa
- Cannot be immediately terminated mid-dose
- 2-hour clinic observation required
- No randomized trial against IV racemic ketamine; observational comparisons show similar acute response and remission rates
Oral (PO) ketamine
Compounded lozenges, troches, or rapid-dissolve tablets. Oral bioavailability is low, roughly 17–30% in pharmacokinetic studies, because of extensive first-pass metabolism to norketamine, so oral dosing produces a different parent-drug-to-metabolite profile than IV. The randomized evidence is small: a 41-patient placebo-controlled trial of 1 mg/kg three times weekly was positive at day 21 (27% remission vs 0%), while a 45-patient midazolam-controlled trial missed its primary endpoint; a 2024 phase 2 trial of an extended-release tablet (R-107) showed lower relapse than placebo among patients enriched for initial response. Widely used in home-based telemedicine programs, which the FDA cautioned against in October 2023 because of the risks of sedation, dissociation, blood-pressure changes, and misuse without monitoring.
Pros
- Home-based administration
- Low cost
- No procedure required
Cons
- Variable absorption; unreliable dosing
- Far less controlled evidence than IV or Spravato (four small RCTs as of 2023)
- Higher abuse potential without supervision
- Quality/safety varies widely across telehealth programs; FDA compounding risk alerts (2022, 2023)
Intramuscular (IM) ketamine
About 93% bioavailability (Clements 1982), doses of 0.25–0.5 mg/kg IM in the one comparative study. The clinical literature is thin: a 27-patient open-label randomized comparison (Chilukuri 2014) found similar acute effects for 0.5 mg/kg IV, 0.5 mg/kg IM, and 0.25 mg/kg IM. Subcutaneous injection has stronger evidence (the 174-patient KADS trial). Faster onset than oral, less precise dose control than IV.
Protocols & dosing
Standard IV ketamine induction protocol (TRD)
Induction phase
- Dose: 0.5 mg/kg IV over 40 minutes (may increase to 0.75–1.0 mg/kg for inadequate response)
- Frequency: 2–3 times per week for 2–3 weeks (6 total infusions typical)
- Monitoring: BP, HR, SpO2, CADSS (Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale), PACU-like recovery until ambulatory
- Duration: Assess response weekly; 6 infusions is a reasonable trial
Maintenance phase (post-induction)
- Taper schedule: Typically weekly → every 2 weeks → every 3–4 weeks as tolerated
- Goal: Minimum effective frequency that maintains remission
- Typical maintenance interval: 2–6 weeks depending on individual response
Spravato (esketamine) protocol
Treatment-resistant depression
- Dose: 56 mg or 84 mg per session, adjusted on efficacy and tolerability (the January 2025 label no longer specifies a 56 mg first dose)
- Weeks 1–4 (induction): Twice weekly
- Weeks 5–8 (transition): Once weekly
- Week 9+ (maintenance): Once weekly or every 2 weeks at effective dose
- Assessment: Re-evaluate therapeutic benefit at the end of the 4-week induction to determine continuation; the label allows use with or without an oral antidepressant for TRD
MDD with suicidality
- Initial dose: 84 mg (reducible to 56 mg for tolerability)
- Weeks 1–4: Twice weekly
- Duration beyond 4 weeks: Not systematically evaluated; continued therapy requires clinical judgment. Given with an oral antidepressant.
Pharmacology
Values from the Ketalar (ketamine injection) and Spravato (esketamine) prescribing information and the cited pharmacokinetic papers: Clements 1982 (IM and oral bioavailability), Yanagihara 2003 (three volunteers) and Chong 2009 (six patients) for oral, sublingual and nasal racemic ketamine. Onset and duration figures are for anesthetic doses.
Ketamine PK/PD quick reference
Mechanism of action
Ketamine's antidepressant mechanism is multifaceted and not fully resolved. Zanos and Gould (2018) reviewed several non-exclusive hypotheses; four are summarized here (they also discuss inhibition of burst firing in the lateral habenula).
The basic pharmacology
Ketamine acts at three receptor types with relevance to antidepressant effects:
- NMDA receptor — antagonist (primary mechanism of interest)
- AMPA receptor — indirect agonist via downstream glutamate release
- Opioid receptor — ketamine activates the opioid system; in a small crossover study (12 completers, stopped early at interim analysis) naltrexone pre-treatment markedly blunted the antidepressant effect but not the dissociation (Williams et al. 2018)
NMDA receptor background
NMDA receptors are ligand-gated, glutamatergic ion channels. They have 7 known subunits (GluN1, GluN2A-D, GluN3A-B). Typical configuration: 2 GluN1 + 2 GluN2 subunits. NMDA activation requires both glutamate binding and post-synaptic depolarization (typically from AMPA activation) to release the magnesium block and allow Ca2+ influx.
Subunit selectivity matters: in the presence of physiological magnesium, channel blockers such as ketamine inhibit GluN2C/GluN2D-containing NMDA receptors more effectively than GluN2A/2B-containing receptors (Kotermanski and Johnson 2009), and GluN2C/2D subunits are enriched on cortical inhibitory (GABAergic) interneurons. This is one basis for the disinhibition hypothesis.
Proposed mechanisms (Zanos 2018)
A. Disinhibition hypothesis
Ketamine blocks NMDA receptors on GABAergic interneurons → reduced inhibitory tone on pyramidal neurons → glutamate release surge → AMPA activation → BDNF release → TrkB activation → mTORC1 activation → increased synaptic protein synthesis → synaptogenesis and enhanced plasticity.
The disinhibition mechanism: ketamine antagonizes NMDA receptors preferentially on GABAergic inhibitory interneurons, reducing inhibitory tone on cortical pyramidal neurons. The resulting glutamate surge activates AMPA receptors on excitatory neurons.
Downstream cascade following AMPA activation: BDNF release → TrkB activation → mTORC1 signaling → increased synaptic protein translation → synaptogenesis and synaptic plasticity.
B. Inhibition of extrasynaptic NMDA receptors
Ketamine antagonizes GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors located outside the post-synaptic density. These extrasynaptic receptors normally provide tonic suppression of protein synthesis machinery; blocking them disinhibits mTORC1 directly, driving the same plasticity cascade.
Ketamine's antagonism of extrasynaptic GluN2B NMDA receptors releases tonic inhibition of mTORC1 signaling, providing a second route to increased synaptic protein synthesis.
C. Blockade of spontaneous NMDA activation
Spontaneous (resting-state) NMDA receptor activity normally activates eEF2 kinase, which phosphorylates eEF2 and suppresses BDNF translation. Ketamine's NMDA blockade inhibits this tonic pathway, allowing BDNF translation to proceed → TrkB activation → plasticity cascade.
D. Hydroxynorketamine (HNK) metabolite pathway
Ketamine is metabolized to hydroxynorketamine (HNK) metabolites. In mice (Zanos 2016), (2R,6R)-HNK produced antidepressant-like effects that were independent of NMDA receptor inhibition and required early, sustained AMPA receptor activation; whether this reflects direct AMPA potentiation is unresolved, and the human relevance is untested. Lepack et al. 2014 showed in rodents that a BDNF-neutralizing antibody infused into the medial prefrontal cortex blocks ketamine's behavioral effects, supporting a required role for BDNF release.
Fourth proposed mechanism: the (2R,6R)-HNK metabolite acts through AMPA receptor activation independent of NMDA receptor antagonism in animal studies. This is one proposed explanation for the antidepressant-like effects of R-ketamine in preclinical models despite its lower NMDA receptor affinity than S-ketamine.
The convergent picture
All four proposed mechanisms converge on increased synaptic protein synthesis → synaptogenesis → enhanced plasticity. Human imaging offers only indirect support: in a 24-patient FDG-PET study, 0.5 mg/kg ketamine produced higher glucose metabolism in the supplementary motor area and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex one day later than 0.2 mg/kg did, and the cingulate change correlated with symptom reduction (Chen 2018). Multiple mechanisms likely contribute, and their relative importance probably varies across patients.
A clinically important wrinkle: Abdallah et al. 2020 found that pre-treatment with the mTORC1 inhibitor rapamycin actually prolonged ketamine's antidepressant effects (29% remission at 2 weeks vs 7% with placebo pretreatment), complicating the simple "mTOR is the final common pathway" narrative. The mechanism picture remains an active area of research.
Evidence base
What the controlled trials actually show, including the ones that missed. Figures are taken from the published abstracts, open-access full texts, or the FDA label; each is linked in the references.
Single-dose randomized trials (reference arm: racemic ketamine 0.5 mg/kg IV over 40 minutes)
| Study | N | Design | Key finding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berman 2000 | 7 | Placebo (saline) crossover, MDD | 25-item HDRS fell by a mean of 14 points after ketamine vs 0 after placebo within 72 hours positive |
| Zarate 2006 (NIMH) | 18 (17 treated) | Placebo crossover, TRD | 71% response and 29% remission the day after infusion; 35% still met response criteria at 1 week. Effect size d = 1.46 at 24 h, 0.68 at 1 week positive |
| Murrough 2013 | 73 | Two-site, parallel, active placebo (midazolam), TRD | 24-h response 64% vs 28% (OR 2.18); MADRS 7.95 points lower with ketamine. Authors: more durability and safety data needed before routine practice positive |
| Lapidus 2014 | 20 (18 completed) | Intranasal racemic ketamine 50 mg vs saline, crossover | 24-h response 44% vs 6%; MADRS difference 7.6 points positive |
| Fava 2020 (dose-ranging) | 99 | Five arms: 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0 mg/kg vs midazolam; six sites, outpatients with TRD | 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg superior to midazolam at day 1; 0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg were not after adjustment. No significant adjusted differences remained at day 3 positive (standard and high dose) |
| Correia-Melo 2020 | 63 | IV esketamine 0.25 mg/kg vs IV racemic 0.5 mg/kg, non-inferiority | 24-h remission 29.4% vs 24.1%; esketamine non-inferior head-to-head |
Repeated-dose racemic ketamine
| Study | N | Design | Key finding |
|---|---|---|---|
| aan het Rot 2010 | 10 | Open-label, six infusions over 12 days in prior single-dose responders | 9 of 10 responded; mean MADRS reduction 85% after the sixth infusion. 8 of 9 relapsed a mean of 19 days later (range 6–45) open-label |
| Singh 2016 | 68 | Twice- or thrice-weekly ketamine vs placebo for up to 4 weeks, multicenter | Day-15 MADRS change −18.4 vs −5.7 (twice weekly) and −17.7 vs −3.1 (thrice weekly); the two schedules produced similar results positive |
| Phillips 2019 | 41 | Midazolam-controlled single infusion, then six open-label infusions over 2 weeks, then weekly maintenance for responders | 59% met response criteria after the six-infusion course (median three infusions to respond); response was maintained during four weekly maintenance infusions positive (course phase open-label) |
| Shiroma 2020 | 54 completers | Six ketamine infusions vs five midazolam infusions followed by one ketamine infusion | No significant difference in MADRS change 24 h after the last infusion (primary outcome). Six infusions beat midazolam before the single-ketamine crossover. Median time to relapse 6 vs 2 weeks, not statistically different primary endpoint not met |
| Ionescu 2019 | 26 | Six infusions vs saline over 3 weeks in TRD with chronic suicidal ideation, medicated outpatients | No difference from placebo in depression or suicidal ideation; 2 vs 1 remitted negative |
| Loo 2023 (KADS) | 174 | Phase 3, subcutaneous ketamine vs midazolam twice weekly for 4 weeks; seven sites | Fixed 0.5 mg/kg cohort (n = 68): remission 6.3% vs 8.8%, no difference. Flexible 0.5–0.9 mg/kg cohort (n = 106): remission (MADRS ≤10) 19.6% vs 2.0%, response 29% vs 4%. Four weeks after the last dose the remission difference had largely faded (8.0% vs 2.1%) positive (flexible dose) fixed dose negative |
Esketamine nasal spray: phase 3 and phase 4 trials
All industry-sponsored. Patients in the TRD trials had failed at least two antidepressants in the current episode; in TRANSFORM-1, -2 and -3 both arms also started a new oral antidepressant.
| Study | N | Design | Key finding |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRANSFORM-2 (Popova 2019) | 227 | Flexible 56/84 mg twice weekly + new antidepressant vs placebo spray + new antidepressant, 4 weeks | MADRS change −19.8 vs −15.8; difference −4.0 points (95% CI −7.3 to −0.6). Most of the drug-placebo difference was present at 24 hours and did not widen through day 28. 7% vs 0.9% discontinued for adverse events positive |
| TRANSFORM-1 (Fedgchin 2019) | 346 | Fixed 56 or 84 mg + new antidepressant vs placebo spray + new antidepressant | Primary endpoint (84 mg) not significant: difference −3.2 points, p = 0.088. Day-28 response 54.1% (56 mg), 53.1% (84 mg) vs 38.9%; remission 36.0%, 38.8% vs 30.6%. NNT for remission 18 and 12 primary endpoint not met |
| TRANSFORM-3 (Ochs-Ross 2020) | Adults ≥65 | Flexible dose + new antidepressant vs placebo spray + new antidepressant | Difference −3.6 points, p = 0.059; not significant. Larger nominal effects in ages 65–74 and in early-onset depression primary endpoint not met |
| SUSTAIN-1 (Daly 2019) | 297 randomized | Randomized withdrawal after ≥16 weeks of esketamine + antidepressant; continue esketamine vs switch to placebo spray | Relapse in stable remitters 26.7% vs 45.3% (HR 0.49; NNT 6); in stable responders 25.8% vs 57.6% (HR 0.30; NNT 4). FDA notes the hazard ratio did not appear constant over time positive |
| ASPIRE I and II (Fu 2020; Ionescu 2021) | 226 and 230 | 84 mg twice weekly vs placebo spray, each with hospitalization and optimized antidepressant, in MDD with active suicidal ideation with intent | MADRS at 24 h: difference −3.8 and −3.9 points. Clinician-rated severity of suicidality (CGI-SS-r): no significant difference in either trial depression endpoint met suicidality endpoint not met |
| ESCAPE-TRD (Reif 2023) | 676 | Open-label, rater-blinded; esketamine vs extended-release quetiapine, each added to an SSRI/SNRI | Remission at week 8: 27.1% vs 17.6%. Remission at week 8 without relapse through week 32: 21.7% vs 14.1% positive |
| Esketamine monotherapy (Janik 2025) | 378 | Phase 4, fixed 56 or 84 mg vs placebo spray, twice weekly for 4 weeks, no oral antidepressant; 51 US sites | Day-28 MADRS difference −5.1 (56 mg) and −6.8 (84 mg); effect sizes 0.48 and 0.63. NNT for response 6.5 and 7.1; for remission 12.3 and 6.7. On day 28, 71–78% of esketamine patients correctly guessed their assignment. The trial's data and design have been publicly challenged (Naudet, Cristea and Gillibert, JAMA Psychiatry 2025), and the independent patient-level re-analysis noted concerns over selection bias and unblinding positive |
| SUSTAIN-3 (Zaki 2023, interim) | 1,148 | Open-label long-term extension, up to 4.5 years | 46.1% in remission (MADRS ≤12) at the maintenance-phase endpoint among those who continued; no new safety signal open-label |
Meta-analyses and independent re-analyses
Real-world effectiveness
Suicidal ideation
- Wilkinson 2018 (individual-participant-data meta-analysis, 10 trials, 167 patients with baseline suicidal ideation): ketamine reduced clinician- and self-rated suicidal ideation within 1 day and for up to 1 week (d = 0.48–0.85), partly independent of mood change. The authors said more long-term safety and suicide-risk data were needed before clinical implementation.
- Grunebaum 2018 (n = 80, midazolam-controlled): 24-hour responders on the Scale for Suicidal Ideation 55% vs 30% (NNT 4).
- Abbar 2022 (n = 156 hospitalized suicidal patients, two infusions 24 h apart vs saline): full remission of suicidal ideas at day 3 in 63.0% vs 31.6%. The effect was driven by bipolar patients (OR 14.1); in the depressive-disorder stratum it was not significant (OR 1.3). At 6 weeks the difference was no longer significant (69.5% vs 56.3%).
- Ionescu 2019 (n = 26, chronic suicidal ideation, six infusions vs saline): negative.
- ASPIRE I and II (esketamine): faster MADRS improvement, no significant difference on the clinician-rated suicidality scale; both arms improved rapidly with hospitalization and standard care.
What is not shown
No randomized trial of ketamine or esketamine has shown a reduction in suicide attempts or deaths. For esketamine, the FDA label states that effectiveness in preventing suicide or in reducing suicidal ideation or behavior has not been demonstrated. Rapid reduction in suicidal ideation is a replicated finding for racemic IV ketamine (Wilkinson 2018; Grunebaum 2018; Abbar 2022), not for esketamine; it is not the same as preventing suicide, and it does not replace hospitalization when that is indicated.
Bipolar depression and PTSD
- Bipolar depression: Diazgranados 2010 (n = 18) and Zarate 2012 (n = 15), single infusions added to lithium or valproate: 71% and 79% responded at some point during the trial vs 6% and 0% on placebo, with benefit lasting about 3 days. The 2021 Cochrane bipolar review found low-certainty evidence for response at 24 hours (two ketamine trials, 33 participants; OR 11.6, 95% CI 1.3–108) and no evidence of a remission benefit.
- PTSD: Feder 2014 (n = 41, single infusion vs midazolam) and Feder 2021 (n = 30, six infusions; response 67% vs 20%, median loss of response 27.5 days) were positive single-site trials. Abdallah 2022 (n = 158 veterans and service members, eight infusions of 0.2 or 0.5 mg/kg vs placebo) found no significant dose-related effect on PTSD symptoms, although the 0.5 mg/kg dose reduced depression scores.
Reading this evidence like a skeptic
- Blinding is imperfect. Ketamine produces dissociation within minutes. Trials using saline placebo are effectively unblinded; midazolam is better but not perfect. In the 2025 monotherapy trial, 71–78% of esketamine-treated patients correctly guessed their assignment, while 47% of placebo patients guessed placebo. Cochrane downgraded its certainty for exactly this reason.
- Control arms improve a lot. In TRANSFORM-1, 38.9% of patients on a new antidepressant plus placebo spray responded and 30.6% remitted by day 28; the investigators suggested expectancy and frequent, lengthy clinic visits as possible explanations. The relevant number is the difference, not the ketamine-arm rate.
- The esketamine effect is modest. Roughly 3–4 MADRS points over placebo at 4 weeks in the adjunctive trials, and 2.9 points in the independent individual-patient-data re-analysis. Two of the three pivotal short-term trials (TRANSFORM-1 and -3) did not meet their primary endpoint.
- Single-dose effects are transient. Only 12.9% of 93 NIMH patients still met response criteria 2 weeks after one infusion (Pennybaker 2017). Repeated dosing extends benefit, but in the one placebo-controlled trial that tested it directly (Shiroma 2020), six infusions were not significantly better than one at the primary endpoint.
- Dose matters. Fixed 0.5 mg/kg subcutaneous ketamine was no better than midazolam in KADS; response-guided escalation to 0.9 mg/kg was. Doses below 0.5 mg/kg IV showed no consistent benefit in the Fava dose-ranging trial.
- Long-term data are thin. Most controlled data cover 4 weeks or less. The longest placebo-controlled esketamine data are SUSTAIN-1's randomized-withdrawal phase (the independent re-analysis noted that FDA concerns about one study centre could not be examined because of data restrictions); the only other long randomized comparison, ESCAPE-TRD, was a 32-week open-label trial against quetiapine.
Ketamine vs. ECT
Two randomized head-to-head trials reached opposite headline conclusions. Ekstrand and colleagues (2024) attribute much of the difference to who was enrolled and how ECT was delivered.
| Study | N | Design | Finding |
|---|---|---|---|
| ELEKT-D (Anand 2023, NEJM) | 403 randomized; 365 treated | Open-label non-inferiority; five US sites; non-psychotic TRD referred for ECT; 89% outpatients. Ketamine 0.5 mg/kg twice weekly (six infusions) vs ECT three times weekly (up to nine sessions; initially right unilateral ultrabrief pulse, with a switch to bilateral permitted) for 3 weeks. Primary outcome: ≥50% drop in self-rated QIDS-SR16 | Response 55.4% (ketamine) vs 41.2% (ECT); difference 14.2 points, non-inferiority met (p < 0.001). MADRS-based remission 38% vs 22%. ECT was associated with a drop in delayed verbal recall at 3 weeks (T-score change −9.7 vs −0.9) with gradual recovery; quality-of-life gains were similar. ECT caused musculoskeletal effects; ketamine caused dissociation |
| ELEKT-D secondary analyses (Jha 2024; Kumpf 2025) | 365 | Jha 2024: post-hoc moderator analyses, not prespecified. Kumpf 2025: secondary analysis of prespecified cognitive outcomes | Outpatients and patients with QIDS-SR16 ≤20 improved more with ketamine; inpatients and very severe patients (QIDS-SR16 >20) improved faster with ECT, with similar scores by end of treatment. ECT recipients performed worse on all cognitive tasks at end of treatment (p < 0.001); among responders there were no cognitive differences at 1, 3 or 6 months |
| KetECT (Ekstrand 2022) | 186 | Open-label non-inferiority; Swedish inpatients with unipolar depression, ages 18–85, including psychotic depression. Ketamine 0.5 mg/kg thrice weekly vs ECT, up to 12 sessions until remission. Primary outcome: remission (MADRS ≤10) | Remission 46% (ketamine) vs 63% (ECT), p = 0.026; response 57% vs 71%. Ketamine was inferior to ECT. Median six sessions to remission in both arms. Serious and long-lasting adverse events, including persisting amnesia, were more common with ECT; adverse events caused more dropouts with ketamine. Among remitters, 70% (ketamine) and 63% (ECT) relapsed within 12 months (p = 0.52), with a median of 57 and 61 days in remission |
| Rhee 2022 (JAMA Psychiatry) | 340 (six trials) | Systematic review and meta-analysis; all six studies in inpatients eligible for ECT; five randomized | Pooled SMD −0.69 favoring ECT for depression severity (95% CI −0.89 to −0.48). No significant differences in cognition/memory or serious adverse events. Methodological quality rated low to moderate; studies underpowered |
Clinical synthesis
Ekstrand and colleagues (2024) compared the two trials directly. KetECT enrolled hospitalized, more severely ill patients, allowed psychotic depression, and gave brief-pulse ECT to remission; ELEKT-D enrolled mostly outpatients without psychosis and capped ECT at nine sessions starting with right-unilateral ultrabrief pulse, producing an ECT remission rate (22%) far below what ECT usually achieves. In KetECT, ketamine still achieved 46% remission in inpatients, and remission was 50% in the small psychotic-depression subgroup.
A defensible reading: for severe, psychotic, or hospitalized depression, ECT remains the better-supported treatment (and for catatonia by long-standing clinical consensus rather than head-to-head trial data). For non-psychotic, moderately-to-severely depressed outpatients with TRD, ketamine is a reasonable alternative with comparable short-term outcomes, fewer acute cognitive effects, and its own burdens (dissociation, blood-pressure rises, more adverse-event dropouts in KetECT, and the need for ongoing treatment). Relapse after either treatment is common without maintenance.
Durability & maintenance strategies
The acute response to ketamine is real but short-lived, and the durability data are the weakest part of the evidence base. After a single infusion, 35% of NIMH patients still met response criteria at 1 week (Zarate 2006) and 12.9% of 93 patients at 2 weeks (Pennybaker 2017). After a six-infusion open-label course, 8 of 9 responders relapsed a mean of 19 days later (aan het Rot 2010); a 2021 systematic review cites a typical median time to relapse of 2–4 weeks (McMullen 2021). Even after remission with ketamine or ECT in KetECT, about two-thirds relapsed within 12 months.
Strategies, by evidence
- Continued dosing (best supported): Phillips 2019 found that responders held their gains through four once-weekly maintenance infusions. SUSTAIN-1 showed that continuing esketamine after 16 weeks roughly halved relapse in stable remitters (26.7% vs 45.3%) and cut it by 70% in stable responders. McMullen 2021 (22 studies) concluded that repeat-dose IV ketamine was the only strategy shown to prolong the acute effect. A 2022 Lancet Psychiatry review of maintenance ketamine (three RCTs, eight open-label trials, 30 case series and reports) found it appears effective across routes, with tachyphylaxis, cognitive impairment, addiction and serious urinary problems seemingly uncommon, while calling for controlled long-term studies.
- Psychotherapy after ketamine (promising, unproven): Wilkinson 2021 randomized 28 responders to CBT or treatment as usual for 14 weeks. The primary outcome (MADRS group-by-time interaction) was not significant (d = 0.65, 95% CI −0.55 to 1.82); the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology favored CBT (d = 0.71). The authors described it as a proof-of-concept study needing a well-powered trial. Price 2022 (n = 154) found that a brief automated computer-based self-association training after a single infusion kept depression scores stably low over 30 days, whereas ketamine plus a sham program drifted back toward placebo levels.
- Behavioral activation: a 2023 case series only (Phillips, Blier and Talbot). Mechanistically plausible; not evidence of efficacy.
- Pharmacological augmentation: two riluzole trials failed to prevent relapse after ketamine (cited in Murrough 2013). No other pharmacological strategy has been shown to extend response (McMullen 2021).
Rapamycin: an interesting wrinkle
Abdallah 2020 pretreated 20 depressed patients with oral rapamycin 6 mg or placebo 2 hours before a ketamine infusion in a double-blind crossover, expecting mTORC1 inhibition to block the antidepressant effect. It did not change the 24-hour response, but two weeks later response (41% vs 13%) and remission (29% vs 7%) were higher after rapamycin plus ketamine. A single small crossover study; hypothesis-generating, not a clinical strategy.
Safety & monitoring
Acute monitoring during infusion
- Blood pressure before dosing and at intervals during and after (transient rises are expected; in the esketamine trials 3–19% of treated patients had a rise of ≥40 mmHg systolic or ≥25 mmHg diastolic within 1.5 hours at least once during the first 4 weeks, vs 1–4% on placebo; peaks at about 40 minutes and lasts about 4 hours). Have an antihypertensive plan.
- Heart rate, SpO2 continuous
- CADSS (Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale) assessment during/after
- Emergency airway equipment available
- Dedicated staff for observation during and after infusion
Common acute side effects
- Dissociation/altered perception (expected; target effect to some degree)
- Hypertension, tachycardia
- Anxiety, sometimes with panic-like quality
- Nausea, occasionally vomiting
- Blurred vision, dizziness
- Headache (next-day, common)
What the esketamine label documents (January 2025)
- Boxed warning: sedation; dissociation; respiratory depression; abuse and misuse; suicidal thoughts and behaviors in young adults. Observation for at least 2 hours after each dose with pulse oximetry; REMS-restricted distribution.
- Sedation occurred in 48–61% of treated patients on the observer scale; 0.3–0.4% had loss of consciousness.
- Contraindications: aneurysmal vascular disease or arteriovenous malformation; history of intracerebral hemorrhage; hypersensitivity to esketamine or ketamine.
- Most common adverse reactions (≥5% and at least twice placebo). Adjunctive TRD trials: dissociation, dizziness, nausea, sedation, vertigo, hypoesthesia, anxiety, lethargy, increased blood pressure, vomiting, feeling drunk. Monotherapy trial: dissociation, nausea, dizziness, headache, anxiety, vomiting, feeling drunk, increased blood pressure, sedation (nausea 24.8%, dissociation 24.3%, dizziness 21.7%, headache 19.0%); most events occurred on dosing days and resolved the same day.
- Driving: no driving or hazardous activity until the next day after a restful sleep.
Longer-term considerations
- Abuse potential: ketamine is a Schedule III controlled substance with a boxed warning for abuse and misuse in the esketamine label. Risk is managed by supervised administration; the FDA's 2023 alert specifically addressed unsupervised at-home use of compounded products.
- Bladder toxicity: ulcerative or interstitial cystitis has been reported with long-term off-label use, misuse or abuse of ketamine. In the esketamine trials, lower urinary tract symptoms (frequency, dysuria, urgency, nocturia, cystitis) were more common than with placebo, but no case of esketamine-related interstitial cystitis was observed in studies lasting up to a year. Ask about urinary symptoms at every maintenance visit.
- Cognitive effects: repeated misuse or abuse of ketamine has been associated with long-term cognitive and memory impairment. At treatment doses the data are reassuring but limited: cognition remained stable over 1- and 3-year open-label esketamine studies, six IV infusions did not impair a neurocognitive battery in a 15-patient series (Shiroma 2014), and in ELEKT-D ketamine-treated patients outperformed ECT-treated patients on cognitive tasks at 3 weeks with no differences among responders at 6 months.
- Reporting bias: a 2018 Lancet Psychiatry systematic review of 60 studies found that side effects after acute dosing were well documented but that long-term and repeated-dose safety were rarely assessed, and recommended large trials with long follow-up (Short 2018). A 2022 review reached similar conclusions: common effects are transient and self-limited; severe bladder pathology has not been reported at prescribed doses (Nikayin 2022).
- Liver: a 2025 analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (Kwan 2025) found mixed disproportionality signals: relative to acetaminophen, fewer reports of hepatitis and liver injury for ketamine but more reports of abnormal liver function and hepatic cytolysis, and more reports of hepatic failure for esketamine; the authors recommended periodic liver-function tests with chronic exposure. Causality is not established. The Ketalar (ketamine injection) label added a Drug-Induced Liver Injury warning in June 2025 (section 5.6, updated March 2026): ketamine is associated with hepatobiliary dysfunction, most often cholestatic, with recurrent use including “medically supervised unapproved indications”; biliary dilatation, stricture and obstruction and sclerosing cholangitis (potentially reversible on discontinuation) have been reported; the label advises baseline liver tests including alkaline phosphatase and GGT before recurrent dosing and periodic monitoring during treatment.
- Tolerance: can develop with frequent use and may drive dose escalation; maintenance reviews describe tachyphylaxis as uncommon at usual intervals, but it is one reason to use the least frequent effective schedule.
Quality concerns in the ketamine clinic landscape
Referring a patient
Our program evaluates patients for ketamine treatment alongside other neuromodulation options (TMS, ECT) to help identify the best fit, and uses measurement-based care to decide whether treatment should continue.
What to include in a referral
- Primary diagnosis and target symptoms
- Medication history with doses, durations, responses (simple summary is fine)
- Prior neuromodulation (TMS, ECT) with responses
- Cardiovascular history, current BP control, any cardiac medications
- Substance use history
- Benzodiazepine use (doses, indication; we may want to taper prior to treatment)
- Suicidality assessment
- Urgency level
Who to flag as urgent
- Active suicidality in severe depression unresponsive to medications
- Severe depression with functional collapse requiring rapid response
- Post-ECT patients needing rapid bridge treatment
- Currently inpatient requiring expedited outpatient continuation
Prisma Health Neuromodulation Program
For ketamine referrals, consultations, or clinical questions:
Behavioral Health and Wellness Pavilion
725 Grove Road, Greenville, SC 29605
Adam Hart, MD — Medical Director, Neuromodulation Program
References
Primary sources for the figures on this page, organized thematically. Every entry was verified against PubMed, PubMed Central, ClinicalTrials.gov, or the FDA in September 2026.
Single-infusion trials
- Berman RM, Cappiello A, Anand A, et al. Antidepressant effects of ketamine in depressed patients. Biol Psychiatry 2000;47(4):351–354. PMID: 10686270
- Zarate CA Jr, Singh JB, Carlson PJ, et al. A randomized trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant major depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006;63(8):856–864. PMID: 16894061
- Murrough JW, Iosifescu DV, Chang LC, et al. Antidepressant efficacy of ketamine in treatment-resistant major depression: a two-site randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry 2013;170(10):1134–1142. PMID: 23982301
- Lapidus KA, Levitch CF, Perez AM, et al. A randomized controlled trial of intranasal ketamine in major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2014;76(12):970–976. PMID: 24821196
- Fava M, Freeman MP, Flynn M, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial of intravenous ketamine as adjunctive therapy in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Mol Psychiatry 2020;25(7):1592–1603. PMID: 30283029
- Correia-Melo FS, Leal GC, Vieira F, et al. Efficacy and safety of adjunctive therapy using esketamine or racemic ketamine for adult treatment-resistant depression: a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study. J Affect Disord 2020;264:527–534. PMID: 31786030
Repeated-dose ketamine
- aan het Rot M, Collins KA, Murrough JW, et al. Safety and efficacy of repeated-dose intravenous ketamine for treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry 2010;67(2):139–145. PMID: 19897179
- Singh JB, Fedgchin M, Daly EJ, et al. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-frequency study of intravenous ketamine in patients with treatment-resistant depression. Am J Psychiatry 2016;173(8):816–826. PMID: 27056608
- Phillips JL, Norris S, Talbot J, et al. Single, repeated, and maintenance ketamine infusions for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry 2019;176(5):401–409. PMID: 30922101
- Shiroma PR, Thuras P, Wels J, et al. A randomized, double-blind, active placebo-controlled study of efficacy, safety, and durability of repeated vs single subanesthetic ketamine for treatment-resistant depression. Transl Psychiatry 2020;10(1):206. PMID: 32591498
- Ionescu DF, Bentley KH, Eikermann M, et al. Repeat-dose ketamine augmentation for treatment-resistant depression with chronic suicidal ideation: a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial. J Affect Disord 2019;243:516–524. PMID: 30286416
- Loo C, Glozier N, Barton D, et al. Efficacy and safety of a 4-week course of repeated subcutaneous ketamine injections for treatment-resistant depression (KADS study): randomised double-blind active-controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2023;223(6):533–541. PMID: 38108319
- Pennybaker SJ, Niciu MJ, Luckenbaugh DA, Zarate CA Jr. Symptomatology and predictors of antidepressant efficacy in extended responders to a single ketamine infusion. J Affect Disord 2017;208:560–566. PMID: 27839782
Esketamine nasal spray trials
- Popova V, Daly EJ, Trivedi M, et al. Efficacy and safety of flexibly dosed esketamine nasal spray combined with a newly initiated oral antidepressant in treatment-resistant depression: a randomized double-blind active-controlled study (TRANSFORM-2). Am J Psychiatry 2019;176(6):428–438. PMID: 31109201
- Fedgchin M, Trivedi M, Daly EJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose esketamine nasal spray combined with a new oral antidepressant in treatment-resistant depression: results of a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study (TRANSFORM-1). Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2019;22(10):616–630. PMID: 31290965
- Ochs-Ross R, Daly EJ, Zhang Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of esketamine nasal spray plus an oral antidepressant in elderly patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRANSFORM-3). Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2020;28(2):121–141. PMID: 31734084
- Daly EJ, Trivedi MH, Janik A, et al. Efficacy of esketamine nasal spray plus oral antidepressant treatment for relapse prevention in patients with treatment-resistant depression: a randomized clinical trial (SUSTAIN-1). JAMA Psychiatry 2019;76(9):893–903. PMID: 31166571
- Fu DJ, Ionescu DF, Li X, et al. Esketamine nasal spray for rapid reduction of major depressive disorder symptoms in patients who have active suicidal ideation with intent: double-blind, randomized study (ASPIRE I). J Clin Psychiatry 2020;81(3):19m13191. PMID: 32412700
- Ionescu DF, Fu DJ, Qiu X, et al. Esketamine nasal spray for rapid reduction of depressive symptoms in patients with major depressive disorder who have active suicide ideation with intent: results of a phase 3, double-blind, randomized study (ASPIRE II). Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2021;24(1):22–31. PMID: 32861217
- Reif A, Bitter I, Buyze J, et al. Esketamine nasal spray versus quetiapine for treatment-resistant depression (ESCAPE-TRD). N Engl J Med 2023;389(14):1298–1309. PMID: 37792613
- Janik A, Qiu X, Lane R, et al. Esketamine monotherapy in adults with treatment-resistant depression: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2025;82(9):877–887. PMID: 40601310
- Zaki N, Chen LN, Lane R, et al. Long-term safety and maintenance of response with esketamine nasal spray in participants with treatment-resistant depression: interim results of the SUSTAIN-3 study. Neuropsychopharmacology 2023;48(8):1225–1233. PMID: 37173512
Meta-analyses, re-analyses and real-world data
- McGirr A, Berlim MT, Bond DJ, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of ketamine in the rapid treatment of major depressive episodes. Psychol Med 2015;45(4):693–704. PMID: 25010396
- Kryst J, Kawalec P, Mitoraj AM, et al. Efficacy of single and repeated administration of ketamine in unipolar and bipolar depression: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Pharmacol Rep 2020;72(3):543–562. PMID: 32301056
- Dean RL, Hurducas C, Hawton K, et al. Ketamine and other glutamate receptor modulators for depression in adults with unipolar major depressive disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021;9(9):CD011612. PMID: 34510411
- Dean RL, Marquardt T, Hurducas C, et al. Ketamine and other glutamate receptor modulators for depression in adults with bipolar disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021;10(10):CD011611. PMID: 34623633
- Bahji A, Vazquez GH, Zarate CA Jr. Comparative efficacy of racemic ketamine and esketamine for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2021;278:542–555. PMID: 33022440
- Nikolin S, Rodgers A, Schwaab A, et al. Ketamine for the treatment of major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine 2023;62:102127. PMID: 37593223
- Elmosalamy A, Tarikogullari I, Patarroyo-Rodriguez L, et al. Intravenous ketamine versus esketamine for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol 2025;15:20451253251394127. PMID: 41244961
- Naudet F, Pellen C, Fodor LA, et al. Efficacy and safety of esketamine for “treatment resistant depression”: registered report for a systematic review with an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. BMC Med 2025;23(1):677. PMID: 41310599
- Naudet F, Cristea IA, Gillibert A. Questionable data and design in esketamine study. JAMA Psychiatry 2025;82(10):1053–1054. PMID: 40833773
- Turner EH. Esketamine for treatment-resistant depression: seven concerns about efficacy and FDA approval. Lancet Psychiatry 2019;6(12):977–979. PMID: 31680014
- Alnefeesi Y, Chen-Li D, Krane E, et al. Real-world effectiveness of ketamine in treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review & meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res 2022;151:693–709. PMID: 35688035
- Sakurai H, Jain F, Foster S, et al. Long-term outcome in outpatients with depression treated with acute and maintenance intravenous ketamine: a retrospective chart review. J Affect Disord 2020;276:660–666. PMID: 32871698
- Martinotti G, Vita A, Fagiolini A, et al. Real-world experience of esketamine use to manage treatment-resistant depression: a multicentric study on safety and effectiveness (REAL-ESK study). J Affect Disord 2022;319:646–654. PMID: 36167246
- Samalin L, Mekaoui L, Rothärmel M, et al. Use of esketamine nasal spray in patients with treatment-resistant depression in routine practice: a real-world French study. Depress Anxiety 2024;2024:7262794. PMID: 40226655
Suicidal ideation, bipolar depression and PTSD
- Price RB, Nock MK, Charney DS, Mathew SJ. Effects of intravenous ketamine on explicit and implicit measures of suicidality in treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry 2009;66(5):522–526. PMID: 19545857
- Wilkinson ST, Ballard ED, Bloch MH, et al. The effect of a single dose of intravenous ketamine on suicidal ideation: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2018;175(2):150–158. PMID: 28969441
- Grunebaum MF, Galfalvy HC, Choo TH, et al. Ketamine for rapid reduction of suicidal thoughts in major depression: a midazolam-controlled randomized clinical trial. Am J Psychiatry 2018;175(4):327–335. PMID: 29202655
- Abbar M, Demattei C, El-Hage W, et al. Ketamine for the acute treatment of severe suicidal ideation: double blind, randomised placebo controlled trial. BMJ 2022;376:e067194. PMID: 35110300
- Diazgranados N, Ibrahim L, Brutsche NE, et al. A randomized add-on trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant bipolar depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010;67(8):793–802. PMID: 20679587
- Zarate CA Jr, Brutsche NE, Ibrahim L, et al. Replication of ketamine's antidepressant efficacy in bipolar depression: a randomized controlled add-on trial. Biol Psychiatry 2012;71(11):939–946. PMID: 22297150
- Feder A, Parides MK, Murrough JW, et al. Efficacy of intravenous ketamine for treatment of chronic posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2014;71(6):681–688. PMID: 24740528
- Feder A, Costi S, Rutter SB, et al. A randomized controlled trial of repeated ketamine administration for chronic posttraumatic stress disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2021;178(2):193–202. PMID: 33397139
- Abdallah CG, Roache JD, Gueorguieva R, et al. Dose-related effects of ketamine for antidepressant-resistant symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder in veterans and active duty military: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled multi-center clinical trial. Neuropsychopharmacology 2022;47(8):1574–1581. PMID: 35046508
Comparisons with ECT
- Anand A, Mathew SJ, Sanacora G, et al. Ketamine versus ECT for nonpsychotic treatment-resistant major depression (ELEKT-D). N Engl J Med 2023;388(25):2315–2325. PMID: 37224232 ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03113968.
- Jha MK, Wilkinson ST, Krishnan K, et al. Ketamine vs electroconvulsive therapy for treatment-resistant depression: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024;7(6):e2417786. PMID: 38916891
- Kumpf KT, Wilkinson ST, Hu B, et al. Comparing the cognitive effects of repeated intravenous ketamine and electroconvulsive therapy in patients with treatment-resistant depression: a secondary analysis of the ELEKT-D trial. J Clin Psychiatry 2025;86(4):25m15781. PMID: 40900112
- Ekstrand J, Fattah C, Persson M, et al. Racemic ketamine as an alternative to electroconvulsive therapy for unipolar depression: a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial (KetECT). Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2022;25(5):339–349. PMID: 35020871
- Ekstrand J, Takamiya A, Nordenskjold A, et al. Ketamine or ECT? What have we learned from the KetECT and ELEKT-D trials? Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2024;27(1):pyad065. PMID: 38114073
- Rhee TG, Shim SR, Forester BP, et al. Efficacy and safety of ketamine vs electroconvulsive therapy among patients with major depressive episode: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 2022;79(12):1162–1172. PMID: 36260324
Durability & maintenance
- Wilkinson ST, Rhee TG, Joormann J, et al. Cognitive behavioral therapy to sustain the antidepressant effects of ketamine in treatment-resistant depression: a randomized clinical trial. Psychother Psychosom 2021;90(5):318–327. PMID: 34186531
- Price RB, Spotts C, Panny B, et al. A novel, brief, fully automated intervention to extend the antidepressant effect of a single ketamine infusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Psychiatry 2022;179(12):959–968. PMID: 36128684
- McMullen EP, Lee Y, Lipsitz O, et al. Strategies to prolong ketamine's efficacy in adults with treatment-resistant depression. Adv Ther 2021;38(6):2795–2820. PMID: 33929660
- Smith-Apeldoorn SY, Veraart JK, Spijker J, Kamphuis J, Schoevers RA. Maintenance ketamine treatment for depression: a systematic review of efficacy, safety, and tolerability. Lancet Psychiatry 2022;9(11):907–921. PMID: 36244360
- Phillips JL, Blier P, Talbot J. Sustaining the benefits of intravenous ketamine with behavioural activation therapy for depression: a case series. J Affect Disord Rep 2023;14:100613. doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2023.100613 (not MEDLINE-indexed)
- Abdallah CG, Averill LA, Gueorguieva R, et al. Modulation of the antidepressant effects of ketamine by the mTORC1 inhibitor rapamycin. Neuropsychopharmacology 2020;45(6):990–997. PMID: 32092760
Mechanism of action
- Zanos P, Gould TD. Mechanisms of ketamine action as an antidepressant. Mol Psychiatry 2018;23(4):801–811. PMID: 29532791
- Zanos P, Moaddel R, Morris PJ, et al. Ketamine and ketamine metabolite pharmacology: insights into therapeutic mechanisms. Pharmacol Rev 2018;70(3):621–660. PMID: 29945898
- Murrough JW, Abdallah CG, Mathew SJ. Targeting glutamate signalling in depression: progress and prospects. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2017;16(7):472–486. PMID: 28303025
- Zanos P, Moaddel R, Morris PJ, et al. NMDAR inhibition-independent antidepressant actions of ketamine metabolites. Nature 2016;533(7604):481–486. PMID: 27144355
- Lepack AE, Fuchikami M, Dwyer JM, Banasr M, Duman RS. BDNF release is required for the behavioral actions of ketamine. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2014;18(1):pyu033. PMID: 25539510
- Williams NR, Heifets BD, Blasey C, et al. Attenuation of antidepressant effects of ketamine by opioid receptor antagonism. Am J Psychiatry 2018;175(12):1205–1215. PMID: 30153752
- Chen MH, Li CT, Lin WC, et al. Persistent antidepressant effect of low-dose ketamine and activation in the supplementary motor area and anterior cingulate cortex in treatment-resistant depression: a randomized control study. J Affect Disord 2018;225:709–714. PMID: 28922734
- Hansen KB, Yi F, Perszyk RE, et al. Structure, function, and allosteric modulation of NMDA receptors. J Gen Physiol 2018;150(8):1081–1105. PMID: 30037851
History, interactions and receptor pharmacology
- Domino EF. Taming the ketamine tiger. 1965. Anesthesiology 2010;113(3):678–684. PMID: 20693870
- Kotermanski SE, Johnson JW. Mg2+ imparts NMDA receptor subtype selectivity to the Alzheimer's drug memantine. J Neurosci 2009;29(9):2774–2779. PMID: 19261873
- Ebert B, Mikkelsen S, Thorkildsen C, Borgbjerg FM. Norketamine, the main metabolite of ketamine, is a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist in the rat cortex and spinal cord. Eur J Pharmacol 1997;333(1):99–104. PMID: 9311667
- Andrashko V, Novak T, Brunovsky M, et al. The antidepressant effect of ketamine is dampened by concomitant benzodiazepine medication. Front Psychiatry 2020;11:844. PMID: 33005153
- Anand A, Charney DS, Oren DA, et al. Attenuation of the neuropsychiatric effects of ketamine with lamotrigine: support for hyperglutamatergic effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000;57(3):270–276. PMID: 10711913
Pharmacokinetics
- Clements JA, Nimmo WS, Grant IS. Bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, and analgesic activity of ketamine in humans. J Pharm Sci 1982;71(5):539–542. PMID: 7097501
- Yanagihara Y, Ohtani M, Kariya S, et al. Plasma concentration profiles of ketamine and norketamine after administration of various ketamine preparations to healthy Japanese volunteers. Biopharm Drug Dispos 2003;24(1):37–43. PMID: 12516077
- Chong C, Schug SA, Page-Sharp M, Jenkins B, Ilett KF. Development of a sublingual/oral formulation of ketamine for use in neuropathic pain: preliminary findings from a three-way randomized, crossover study. Clin Drug Investig 2009;29(5):317–324. PMID: 19366273
- Peltoniemi MA, Hagelberg NM, Olkkola KT, Saari TI. Ketamine: a review of clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in anesthesia and pain therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet 2016;55(9):1059–1077. PMID: 27028535
- Chilukuri H, Reddy NP, Pathapati RM, et al. Acute antidepressant effects of intramuscular versus intravenous ketamine. Indian J Psychol Med 2014;36(1):71–76. PMID: 24701015
Oral ketamine
- Domany Y, Bleich-Cohen M, Tarrasch R, et al. Repeated oral ketamine for out-patient treatment of resistant depression: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept study. Br J Psychiatry 2019;214(1):20–26. PMID: 30246667
- Glue P, Loo C, Fam J, et al. Extended-release ketamine tablets for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Nat Med 2024;30(7):2004–2009. PMID: 38914860
- Silberbauer LR, Eggerstorfer B, Michenthaler P, et al. Oral ketamine for the treatment of major depressive and bipolar disorder, a randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2026;394(Pt A):120466. PMID: 41101490
- Meshkat S, Haikazian S, Di Vincenzo JD, et al. Oral ketamine for depression: an updated systematic review. World J Biol Psychiatry 2023;24(7):545–557. PMID: 36651238
Safety, guidance and regulatory documents
- Short B, Fong J, Galvez V, Shelker W, Loo CK. Side-effects associated with ketamine use in depression: a systematic review. Lancet Psychiatry 2018;5(1):65–78. PMID: 28757132
- Kwan ATH, Lakhani M, Teopiz KM, et al. Hepatic adverse events associated with ketamine and esketamine: a population-based disproportionality analysis. J Affect Disord 2025;374:390–396. PMID: 39818335
- Nikayin S, Murphy E, Krystal JH, Wilkinson ST. Long-term safety of ketamine and esketamine in treatment of depression. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2022;21(6):777–787. PMID: 35416105
- Shiroma PR, Albott CS, Johns B, et al. Neurocognitive performance and serial intravenous subanesthetic ketamine in treatment-resistant depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2014;17(11):1805–1813. PMID: 24963561
- Sanacora G, Frye MA, McDonald W, et al. A consensus statement on the use of ketamine in the treatment of mood disorders. JAMA Psychiatry 2017;74(4):399–405. PMID: 28249076
- McIntyre RS, Rosenblat JD, Nemeroff CB, et al. Synthesizing the evidence for ketamine and esketamine in treatment-resistant depression: an international expert opinion on the available evidence and implementation. Am J Psychiatry 2021;178(5):383–399. PMID: 33726522
- KETALAR (ketamine hydrochloride) injection, CIII. Full prescribing information, Par Health, revised 03/2026. DailyMed
- SPRAVATO (esketamine) nasal spray, CIII. Full prescribing information, revised 01/2025. Janssen Pharmaceuticals. FDA label (PDF). Approval history: Drugs@FDA NDA 211243 (original approval 03/05/2019; suicidality indication 07/31/2020; monotherapy indication 01/17/2025).
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA warns patients and health care providers about potential risks associated with compounded ketamine products, including oral formulations, for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Compounding risk alert, October 10, 2023. Archived copy (Internet Archive); the FDA's Compounding Risk Alerts index lists the alert and links to this snapshot after the original page was retired in 2026.
Who responds to ketamine — and can we tell before starting?
Response rates across ketamine and esketamine studies typically land in the 50–70% range, meaning roughly 30–50% of TRD patients don't meet response criteria. Biomarker-based prediction for ketamine is less mature than for TMS or ECT — no single pretreatment variable has been robustly validated (Turrini 2024). That said, several clinical features and imaging signals carry real, replicated signal worth knowing.
Three reasons patients don't respond
Ketamine non-response, like non-response to any antidepressant, usually reflects one of three underlying factors. Distinguishing them matters because the right next move is different for each.
Clinical predictors that actually carry weight
Reviews of ketamine predictor studies converge on a small set of clinical features that have been replicated across independent cohorts (Niciu 2014; Rong 2018; Turrini 2024). None is sufficient to deny a trial to a patient who would otherwise qualify, but each meaningfully shifts pre-infusion expectations.
Family history of alcohol use disorder
Phelps 2009; Niciu 2014First-degree relatives with alcohol dependence — a proxy for inherited glutamatergic phenotype — associated with larger and more durable antidepressant response to a single ketamine infusion. Replicated in both MDD and bipolar depression. One of the most consistent pretreatment predictors in the literature.
Higher BMI
Niciu 2014; Murrough 2013Higher BMI predicts greater acute (230-minute, day-1) improvement, though less clearly sustained at day 7+. Potentially reflects metabolic-inflammatory signaling that interacts with ketamine's mechanism. Observed across multiple cohorts, though effect size is modest.
Anxious depression / anhedonia
Ionescu 2014; Lally 2014Patients with dimensional anxious depression show greater and longer response durations; baseline anhedonia severity has been associated with greater response in at least one community cohort. Bipolar depression with baseline anhedonia showed a 73% relative increase in response likelihood in one analysis.
Amygdala–sgACC connectivity
Nakamura 2021Resting-state fMRI showed differential right amygdala–subgenual ACC connectivity between ketamine responders and non-responders at baseline in TRD. Small sample (n=15), but converges with the broader sgACC-as-hub theme emerging across depression treatments. Not yet clinically actionable.
Post-infusion gamma power
Turrini 2024 systematic reviewThe most replicated longitudinal biomarker across 69 imaging studies: post-treatment increases in frontoparietal gamma power correlate with response. Potentially a pharmacodynamic readout that could help identify likely responders after the first infusion — more useful for dose adjustment than pre-treatment selection.
Response to first infusion
Zhan 2019; Pennybaker 2017Perhaps the most practical: response trajectory after a single infusion robustly predicts response to a full repeated-dosing series. Patients with meaningful early improvement tend to maintain it; non-responders at 24–48 hours rarely convert to responders with additional infusions at the same dose.
Features that do not carry the weight they're often assumed to
- Severity alone — baseline MADRS/HDRS severity is not a consistent predictor. Severely depressed patients do not uniformly respond better or worse.
- Bipolar vs. unipolar — ketamine appears to work in both populations with broadly comparable acute response rates, though bipolar patients may require closer mood monitoring.
- Number of prior treatment failures — unlike ECT, where episode chronicity and medication resistance predict poorer response, ketamine's effect size does not robustly track with prior treatment failure count.
- Dissociation intensity — conflicting evidence. Some studies associate greater peri-infusion dissociation with better acute response; others don't replicate. Not useful as a selection criterion.
What this means for practice today
Ketamine biomarker-guided selection is not yet clinical reality. What is deployable today:
- Attend to the three replicated clinical predictors — family history of alcohol use disorder, higher BMI, and anxious or anhedonic presentation — when setting pre-treatment expectations and counseling patients.
- Treat the medical context first. Untreated sleep, thyroid, B12, substance use, and inflammatory conditions should be addressed before — or concurrent with — an infusion series rather than ignored.
- Use the first-infusion response as a practical stratification signal. A patient with minimal response at 24–48 hours is unlikely to convert with additional standard-dose infusions; this is a point to reassess dose, frequency, protocol, or alternative treatment — not to reflexively extend the series.
- Build the psychosocial scaffolding — integration, therapy, peer support, addressing environmental stressors — as a core element of the protocol rather than an optional add-on. Durability depends on it.
- Be honest with patients about what's known and not known. The evidence for acute ketamine effect is strong; the evidence for individual prediction is weak; the field is moving — but not fast enough to wait on for a patient in front of you.
Patients who don't respond to ketamine aren't failing the treatment. The treatment is running into something the protocol alone can't reach — biological, medical, or psychosocial — and the clinical task is to figure out which, and adjust the plan accordingly.
- Niciu MJ, Luckenbaugh DA, Ionescu DF, et al. Clinical predictors of ketamine response in treatment-resistant major depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014;75(5):e417–e423. doi:10.4088/JCP.13m08698. PMID: 24922494.
- Rong C, Park C, Rosenblat JD, et al. Predictors of response to ketamine in treatment resistant major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(4):771. doi:10.3390/ijerph15040771. PMID: 29673146.
- Phelps LE, Brutsche N, Moral JR, Luckenbaugh DA, Manji HK, Zarate CA Jr. Family history of alcohol dependence and initial antidepressant response to an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;65(2):181–184. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.09.029. PMID: 18996507.
- Nakamura T, Tomita M, Horikawa N, et al. Functional connectivity between the amygdala and subgenual cingulate gyrus predicts the antidepressant effects of ketamine in patients with treatment-resistant depression. Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2021;41(2):168–178. doi:10.1002/npr2.12165.
- Ionescu DF, Luckenbaugh DA, Niciu MJ, et al. A single infusion of ketamine improves depression scores in patients with anxious bipolar depression. Bipolar Disord. 2014;16(4):394–400. doi:10.1111/bdi.12182.
- Turrini A, Raschellà S, Fregna L, et al. Brain-based correlates of antidepressant response to ketamine: a comprehensive systematic review of neuroimaging studies. Lancet Psychiatry. 2024;11(1):50–64. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00183-9.